People with lesser earnings pay less in taxes in many industrialized nations because of implementing a progressive tax structure. Higher-income individuals are subject to a higher tax rate.
According to this logic, individuals with lower earnings must spend almost all of it on necessities like food and shelter, while those with higher incomes may do so with just a tiny fraction.
No of how much money you make, everyone who is subject to paying taxes pays the same amount under a flat tax. People who make $1 billion each year would pay $150 million in taxes under a 15% flat rate, while those who earn $10,000 each year would pay $1500.
People who argue against using a flat tax point to nations with flat taxes but cannot offer social services for the poor as an example.
In Greenland, for example, there is a 45 percent flat tax, which is one of the highest taxes in the world. On the other hand, Greenland lacks many of the social services enjoyed by many affluent nations.
Mongolia, Kazakhstan, Bolivia, and Russia all have flat taxes of 10% or 13%, but none of these nations have created social sectors to support these low tax rates.
There are flat taxes of 16 percent in Hungary, Romania, and Lithuania and flat taxes of 20 percent in Lithuania and Georgia. The living conditions of many countries with flat fees are poorer than those of the countries around them.
On the other hand, a flat tax has some supporters who argue that it encourages wealthy people to stay in the nation and spend their money there. When the UK government taxed the Beetles at 95% of their revenue, they set up offshore bank accounts in tax havens to avoid paying excessive taxes.
To encourage the wealthy in the United States to spend their money locally rather than stash it away in tax havens, a flat tax is favored by many Americans.
Also See: Countries That Use the Euro 2022
As a result, some argue that not taxing the wealthy at a greater rate than the rest of us would leave important social institutions like schools and roads underfunded.